Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Timothy Richardson v. Gerald Branker
as 17-2
Petitioner - Appellee:
TIMOTHY RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellant:
GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Richardson v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00108
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Timothy Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Richardson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20267
Plaintiff:
Timothy Richardson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gifford v. Evans et al
as 5:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Dustin D Gifford
Defendant:
Edward L Evans, Mike Addison, Mike Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDDISH v. BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv03662
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. REDDISH
Defendant:
BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, LLOYD NIPPONS, MATTHEW EDINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bown v. Reinke et al
as 1:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
William A. Bown
Defendant:
Brent D. Reinke, Rona Siegert, Randy E Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Richardson v. Gerald Branker
as 11-2
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Timothy Richardson v. Gerald Branker
as 11-1
Petitioner - Appellee:
TIMOTHY RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellant:
GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Lerajjareanra Kelly v. Jeffery Zmuda, et al
as 10-35782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LERAJJAREANRA O. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY D. ZMUDA, BRENT REINKE, PAM SONNEN and others
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly v. Zmuda et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly
Defendant:
Jefferey D Zmuda, Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
