Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Frederick Banks v. Dr. Allissa Marquez, et al
as 17-6387
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DR. ALLISSA MARQUEZ, DR. LOGAN GRADDY, DR. CAHILL and others
COBBLE v. NEELEY et al
as 1:2016cv00235
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
ROBERT R NEELEY, ROBERT W CHASTEEN, JR, JENNIFER WARREN PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2016cv04519
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Eric Henry, S. Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowdy v. U. S. District Court (Northern District ,Mississippi) et al
as 3:2015cv00655
Plaintiff:
William C. Dowdy, Jr.
Defendant:
U. S. District Court (Northern District ,Mississippi) and Neal B. Biggers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ward v. U. S. District Court et al
as 3:2015cv00371
Plaintiff:
Preston David Ward
Defendant:
U. S. District Court, State of Mississippi and U. S. Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Department of Behavorial Health et al
as 1:2014cv04146
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Department of Behavorial Health, Georgia Regional Hospital, Annette Garvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCall v. District Court et al
as 1:2014cv03535
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
U S District Court, Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Counsel and Louisiana Judiciary Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
