Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Williams v. United States Park Police et al
as 8:2015cv03685
Plaintiff:
Holly Ann Williams
Defendant:
United States Park Police and Pierell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams
as 1:2015cv03685
Plaintiff:
Holly Ann Williams
Defendant:
United States Park Police and Officer Pierell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jay Mellen v. United States Park Police, et al
as 15-5328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jay Mellen
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Park Police, Robert Maclean, Park Police Chief; in official and private positions, Sally Jewell, Secretary; in official and private positions and others
MELLEN v. UNITED STATES PARK POLICE
as 1:2015cv01581
Plaintiff:
JAY MELLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PARK POLICE , ROBERT MACLEAN , SALLY JEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
WILSON v. U.S. PARK POLICE et al
as 1:2013cv00506
Plaintiff:
RORY CAVANAUGH WILSON
Defendant:
U.S. PARK POLICE, HAYES, K. SWOPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CHOI v. BECK et al
as 1:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHOI
Defendant:
PHILIP BECK, ROBERT LACHANCE, JAMES LASKA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CHOI v. BOND et al
as 1:2011cv02002
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHOI
Defendant:
BRIAN K. BOND, VALERIE JARRETT, JAMES MESSINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PATOCK v. FOX NEWS et al
as 1:2011cv01910
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. PATOCK, SR.
Defendant:
NBC TELEVISION NETWORK, NBC NEWS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patock v. Fox News Network et al
as 4:2011cv00682
Plaintiff:
James Michael Patock, Sr.
Defendant:
Fox News Network, Washington Post, Arizona Republic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patock v. Fox News television channel et al
as 1:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
James Patock
Defendant:
Fox News television channel, Channel 12 News television channel, Channel 12 News television channel reporter William Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
