Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Daniels-McDaniel v. Hickey et al
as 2:2010cv00722
Plaintiff:
Tyrone V. Daniels-McDaniel
Defendant:
FNU Hickey, FNU Werner, FNU Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. Daniels
as 1:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
Winfred F. Nicholson
Defendant:
Theresa V. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Daniels v. Lake County Sheriff et al
as 1:2009cv03682
Plaintiff:
Dwayne V Daniels
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff and Officer Thomason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Daniels, et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al
as 09-35438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT V. DANIELS, CONNIE M. DANIELS, DONALD R. SMITH and others
Defendant:
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
TONI PHILLIPS, DONNA SUE PIERCE, ROBERT PIERCE and others
Daniels v. Cobb Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2008cv03863
Petitioner:
Gail V. Daniels
Respondent:
Cobb Judicial Circuit, Dorothy Robinson, John Hilderbrand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniels v. Salt Lake County Metro Jail
as 2:2007cv00658
Plaintiff:
Tyrone V. Daniels
Defendant:
Salt Lake County Metro Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels, et al v. City of Dallas, et al
as 07-10883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERONDA DANIELS, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of L V Daniels Jr Deceased, L V DANIELS, SR., Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of L V Daniels Jr Deceased and LILLIE RUE DANIELS, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of L V Daniels Jr Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DALLAS and KENT OWEN WOLVERTON, City of Dallas Officer Individually and in his Official Capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
