Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Defendant:
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. , VONAGE AMERICA INC. and Vonage Marketing LLC
Counter_claimant:
VONAGE AMERICA INC. , VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. and Vonage Marketing LLC
Counter_defendant:
Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AIP Acquisition LLC v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
AIP Acquisition LLC
Defendant:
Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America Inc. and Vonage Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv01366
Plaintiff:
Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Vonage Holdings Corp. , Vonage America, Inc. and Vonage Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arthur Merkin et al v. Vonage America Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08026
Defendant:
Does and Vonage America Inc
Plaintiff:
Arthur Merkin and James Smith
Telinit Technologies, LLC v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al
as 2:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Telinit Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Vonage Holdings Corp., Vonage America, Inc. and Vonage Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Gangi
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Plaintiff:
PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee:
QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party:
CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
GTZM Technology Ventures LTD v. Vonage America Inc. et al.
as 1:2012cv00983
Plaintiff:
GTZM Technology Ventures LTD
Defendant:
Vonage America Inc. , Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee:
QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee:
CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party:
AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor:
JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
