Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doub v. Brittian et al
as 1:2019cv01915
Defendant:
LT. McCoy, Holly, Brittian and others
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Doub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEFF v. PKS HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01826
Plaintiff:
TONI CAIAZZO NEFF
Defendant:
PKS HOLDINGS, LLC, PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC., MHC SECURITIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Spurgeon v. Purcell et al
as 4:2018cv00764
Plaintiff:
Crystal Hogan Spurgeon
Defendant:
Edward C. Purcell, Jr. and Matthew Hashuga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRUMGO, SR. v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv04879
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN DRUMGO, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRITTEN, MAJOR BUHINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bressi v. Brennen et al
as 4:2017cv01742
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Bressi
Defendant:
Jeffery Brennen , Edward Purcell and Christopher Lapotskie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURCELL v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv01845
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. PURCELL, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bronson v. The General Assembly of the State of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Purcell Bronson
Defendant:
The General Assembly of the State of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Board of Probatin and Parole, Pennsylvania Courts of Common Pleas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PURCELL v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04632
Plaintiff:
DEBORA PURCELL
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
