Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Stevenson v. Frink
as 1:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
James Dominic Stevenson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Charles Randolph Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00298
Petitioner:
Charles Randolph Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
thomas v. Gamboa
as 3:2022cv01051
Petitioner:
DAVID JON thomas
Defendant:
Warden Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. thomas et al
as 3:2022cv01047
Defendant:
DAVID JON thomas and Warden Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
thomas v. Gamboa
as 3:2022cv01043
Petitioner:
DAVID JON thomas
Defendant:
Warden Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAUGHTRY v. PROSSER et al
as 5:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CASTAVIOUS DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
LT PROSSER, CERT OFFICER SLAPPY, WARDEN MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burdick v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
Robert Jason Burdick
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Angela Wethington
as 21-7699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA WETHINGTON, PREA Manager-Oerations Manager, HARVEY SPENCER, SXI-Chief Secretary, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Eastern Regional Operations Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
