Cases 21 - 30 of 221
Jackson v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Warren Jackson
Defendant:
Mom, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Warren v. Whitcomb et al
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Charles Warren
Defendant:
Scottie Whitcomb, Laura Rash and Derrick Times
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Colony Insurance Company v. Dawson et al
as 2:2022cv02050
Plaintiff:
Colony Insurance Company
Defendant:
Steven P. Dawson, David Warren Whitt, David Joshua Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Featherston v. Horan et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Featherston
Defendant:
Chris Horan, Ball, Bruce Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Culclager et al
as 4:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Andrea Culclager, Todd Ball, Keyon Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Warren T Jackson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. USA et al
as 4:2021cv00584
Defendant:
Valerie, Little Rock Police Department, Arkansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2021cv00293
Plaintiff:
Katherine R Warren
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stompingbear v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, John Rodgers, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raper v. Warren, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Denisa Pennington, Shawn Hildreth, Does Warren Arkansas City Council Members; Police Officer Alex and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie Dawn McClain Raper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
