Cases 21 - 30 of 128
LAROSE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
WESLY LAROSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Martin v. Ruebart et al
as 3:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Weslie Martin
Respondent:
William Ruebart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fabricio v. Lee
as 21-2964
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ederick Fabricio
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. Miller, C.O. J. Erns, C.O. Chase and others
Defendant:
Supt. W. Lee, Supt. T. Griffin, Dep. SS. E. Burnett and others
LAROSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61188
Plaintiff:
WESLY LAROSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Weslie Martin
Defendant:
Nevada, State of and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAWTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37257
Plaintiff:
WESLY VAWTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mote v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Defendant:
Normal Police Department, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bloomington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Mote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinkle v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Wesly B Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2021cv00199
Defendant:
William Reubart, State of Nevada, James Weiland and others
Plaintiff:
Weslie Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
