Cases 21 - 30 of 36
William Cannon v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-60272
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CANNON
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary and CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
United States v. William Cannon
as 12-1362
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William Cannon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SCOTT v. MCNEIL
as 4:2010cv00571
Plaintiff:
JIMMY JONES SCOTT, SR
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, DUFFIE HARRISON, DARRELL VALENTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Druz v. Preston Frankfurt, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Hasan Subhi Druz and Hasan Subhi Druz
Defendant:
Preston Frankfurt, Inc., Airline Restaurant, Inc., William Cannon Restaurant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv01255
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Type:
Bankruptcy
William Cannon, Jr. v. Roger Walker, Jr.
as 09-1093
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CANNON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR.
William Cannon, Jr. v. Robert Hughes
as 08-2719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CANNON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HUGHES, DEREK CLELAND, JAMES BEST and others
Shelter Insurance Company et al v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Shelter Insurance Company and William Cannon
Defendant:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
