Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robert Mann, Sr., et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 17-17048
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT MANN, Sr., VERN MURPHY-MANN, DEBORAH MANN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT and SAMUEL D. SOMERS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. TENNIS and RANDY R. LOZOYA
Mann et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
Robert Mann, Sr. , Vern Murphy-Mann , Deborah Mann and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento , Sacramento Police Department , Samuel D. Somers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann, Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2016cv01847
Plaintiff:
William Mann, Sr. , Robert Mann , Deborah Mann and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, John Tennis and Randy Lozoya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann, Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2016at00968
Plaintiff:
William Mann, Sr. , Robert Mann , Deborah Mann and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and DOES 1-50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuerbitz v. Meisner et al
as 4:2016cv12736
Plaintiff:
Arnold Kuerbitz
Defendant:
Andrew E. Meisner, William Mann, Wandrie William and others
DEGROAT et al v. COOPER et al
as 2:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIE R. DEGROAT, GLENN VAN DUNK, JR., JUNE L. VAN DUNK and others
Defendant:
SCOTT COOPER, MICHAEL COSTIGAN, JENNIFER DAVISSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. William Luksic
as 12-55454
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM MANN LUKSIC
Luksic v. USA
as 3:2011cv01861
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Mann Luksic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
