Cases 21 - 30 of 3,877
Yang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Zinan Yang
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Associate irector Connie Nolan and Ur M Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Feng v. Kelai Corp.
as 24-979
Plaintiff:
SHANGGANG FENG, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
KELAI CORP., d/b/a Jef Chinese, FAN YANG, JAY HUANG and others
Hatcher v. Yang et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hatcher
Defendant:
Sylvain Yang and Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
FAULKNER v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
DONNAIRE FAULKNER
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a XIANGMING CHEN, DEFENDANT 2 a/k/a MING CHEN, DEFENDANT 3 a/k/a YANG HAOYU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yang et al v. DeRiggi
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Wang Pin Kuan Yang and The Wang Pin Kuan Yang Trust of Chicago
Defendant:
Louis DeRiggi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
