Cases 31 - 40 of 12,782
Grenell v. Troye
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Richard Grenell
Defendant:
Olivia Troye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Harris v. United States
as 5:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Leon Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
Jonathan Gould v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 24-1704
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOULD
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
RE Carroll Management Company v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
RE CARROLL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CIP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CARROLL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT US, LLC and others
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET, INCORPORATED, DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC. and THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch of United States Government
as 24-5090
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Judicial Branch of United States Government
Starlette Thompson et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Starlette Thompson and Patrina Holloway
Defendant:
County of Riverside, San Bernardino Dept of Public Social Sevices, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Parker v. Parker
as 1:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Mary Parker
Defendant:
Rebecca Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
E.N. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02284
Plaintiff:
E.N.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Adeyinka v. Akintomide
as 1:2024cv01129
Defendant:
Mr. Olalekan Akintomide
Claimant:
Mrs. Joyce Adeyinka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 All Writs Act
Madera v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02903
Plaintiff:
Antonio Madera
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Craig W. Tiejen, William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 267
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
