Cases 31 - 40 of 1,159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Ling v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10406
Plaintiff:
Sue Ling
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Guangzhou Xiao Ling Wan Trading Co., Ltd v. Marc Jacobs Trademarks LLC
as 1:2023cv09975
Plaintiff:
Guangzhou Xiao Ling Wan Trading Co., Ltd doing business as LINGWANUS Store and Guangzhou Xiao Ling Wan Trading Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Marc Jacobs Trademarks LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Lopez v. CMJ 3512 INC. et al
as 1:2023cv08376
Defendant:
How Yan Sy, CMJ 3512 INC. doing business as Golden House, Mei Jin Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Lopez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bank of America, N.A. et al v. Jenzabar, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12684
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Jenzabar, Inc., LING CHAI MAGINN, ROBERT MAGINN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
