Cases 31 - 40 of 40
LEAK v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WINSTON SALEM et al
as 1:2013cv00837
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEAK
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WINSTON SALEM, LARRY C. WOODS, MARTHA C. DORSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mulder v. Norton et al
as 5:2013cv00574
Plaintiff:
Edward Mulder
Defendant:
Scott Norton, B.M. Kidd, T.G. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Toman et al
as 5:2013cv00495
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
William C. Toman, Jr., R. M. Ashley, K. D. Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
QUICK v. USA
as 1:2012cv00426
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
KENNETH LOUIS QUICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
QUICK v. USA
as 1:2011cv00874
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
VALENTE TYRONE QUICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TOMPKINS v. HERRON et al
as 1:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
JOEL HERRON, WILLIAM HYATT, JOHN DOE PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penrod v. Quick et al
as 5:2011hc02012
Petitioner:
Donald Adam Penrod
Respondent:
Don Quick and Carol Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
United States of America v. 482 Deaverview Road, Asheville, North Carolina et al
as 1:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
482 Deaverview Road, Asheville, North Carolina, Real property formerly known as ISI Quick Trip and $1,677,381.00 in United States currency, criminal proceeds
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Property Forfeiture
REEVES v. HUBBARD et al
as 1:2008cv00635
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. REEVES
Defendant:
FREDERICK HUBBARD, ALBERT THOMAS, BRAD PERRITT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. POE et al
as 1:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
ZANE ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOE POE, JERRY QUICK, JIMMY L. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
