Cases 31 - 40 of 265,534
Spengler v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant:
FREDERICK D. WILLIAMS, Dr.; individual capacity, ZUNIGA, Ms.; individual capacity, HIMAYA, RN; individual capacity and others
Miller v. U.S. Postal Inspection Service
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
PARIS M. MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE, DAMIAN WILLIAMS and U.S. ATTORNEY OF NYS SOUTHERN DISTRICT
SCOTT v. WEEKS
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM SCOTT
Defendant:
NOLAN WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wareka v. Radiant Beauty Med Spa Management Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04088
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Radiant Beauty Med Spa Management Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Williams v. City of Louisville et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Publlic Affairs, Human Resources Victims Right Services, Craig Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunten v. Donat
as 24-1344
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BROWN, PATRICIA BUNTEN, TAMIE HOLLINS and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DONAT, GEORGE GARRISON, WILLIAM HORTON and others
Young v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tenika C Young
Defendant:
Jackie D Williams and Memphis City Cartage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
JOHNSON et al v. META PLATFORMS, INC.
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
JOYCELYNN JOHNSON, VALERIE JOHNSON, Brian McGee and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Miller v. Alegro Trading, LLC
as 1:2024cv21932
Plaintiff:
William Miller
Defendant:
Alegro Trading, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Watson v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Tyson Nathaniel Watson
Defendant:
Korey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
