Cases 31 - 40 of 205
LAKE GARRISON, INC. v. DIPIETRO
as 1:2022cv05347
Plaintiff:
LAKE GARRISON, INC.
Defendant:
PETER D. DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
DIPIETRO v. J AND S AUTOHAUS et al
as 3:2022cv05107
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO
Defendant:
J AND S AUTOHAUS and TONY NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Annette Williams v. Edward Cohn
as 22-1823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNETTE L. WILLIAMS, Successor Trustee of the Harry R. Williams Revocable Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD S. COHN, Substitute Trustee of the law firm of Cohn, Goldberg & Deutsch, LLC, COHN, GOLDBERG & DEUTSCH, LLC, ORLANS, P.C. and others
DIPIETRO v. J AND S AUTOHAUS et al
as 2:2022cv02976
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO
Defendant:
J AND S AUTOHAUS and TONY NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 22-2270
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
CARVANA PHILADELPHIA, CARVANA CO, CARVANA LLC and others
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 22-2271
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, DON HANKEY, BRET HANKEY and others
DiPietro v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv80857
Plaintiff:
Edward J. DiPietro
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Robert DiPietro v. Laretha Lockhart
as 22-10609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Defendant / Appellee:
LARETHA URETT LOCKHART
Gray v. DiPietro
as 2:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Nicola Gray
Defendant:
Jacob DiPietro
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bruce Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
