Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Stockton v. Wake County et al
as 5:2013ct03302
Plaintiff:
Tanya Stockton
Defendant:
Wake County , Donnie Harrison , Obinnaya C Umesi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wake County et al
as 5:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Tanya Stockton
Defendant:
Wake County , Donnie Harrison, Obinnaya C Umesi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels et al v. Benston et al
as 5:2013ct03286
Plaintiff:
Antwan Daniels, James C. Willis, Edron C. Lewis and others
Defendant:
Prentice Benston, Rodney Hester, Benny Lennon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. White, et al
as 5:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
Theodore Justice
Defendant:
Peter White , Samuel Booth Currin , Allison S. Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Longo et al v. Trojan Horse, Ltd. et al
as 5:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Garibaldie E. Longo , Allen F Hester , Carl W Swanson and others
Defendant:
Trojan Horse, Ltd., Glen Burnie Hauling, Inc., Trojan Horse LTD 401(k) Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hester v. Astrue
as 7:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Woody D. Hester
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Hester Personal Property
as 7:2012cv00307
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Hester Personal Property, Specifically and $20,687.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
HESTER v. NICHOLS DODGE, INC.
as 1:2012cv01014
Defendant:
NICHOLS DODGE, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. HESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnette v. Lawrence et al
as 5:2012ct03124
Plaintiff:
Donterrius Barnette
Defendant:
Solomon Lawrence, Morris Reid, Irvin Ryan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. USA
as 5:2012cv00222
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randy Rashahn Hester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
