Cases 31 - 40 of 830
ISHRAT v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
KHALIQ A. ISHRAT
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, MARY LOCKLEAR, TAMMIE STOCKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Mouton v. Locklear
as 4:2023cv04216
Plaintiff:
Bobby R. Mouton
Defendant:
Troy Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CURTIS MCGILL
Defendant:
D. LOCKLEAR, J. OSUNA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamel Lunsford v. Warden Jacob
as 23-7075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JACOB, WARDEN LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner of Prison/Director and others
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, ASSOCIATE WARDEN, TODD E. ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilson v. Locklear
as 5:2023hc02234
Petitioner:
Jarrell Damont Wilson
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cagle v. Ransom et al
as 5:2023ct03287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Cagle
Defendant:
G. Ransom, J. Hunt, Marie Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
