Cases 31 - 40 of 523
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County, BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff, DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11457
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenneth Morrell v. USA, et al
as 23-11459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. MORRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Kenneth Morrell v. USA, et al
as 23-11450
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH L. MORRELL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bruce Morrell v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01054
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Morrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morrell v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv13874
Plaintiff:
Raymond Morrell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Morrell
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
