Cases 31 - 40 of 25,205
Serenity Araiza et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04600
Plaintiff:
SERENITY ARAIZA, RICHARD SAMUELSON, ASHLEY TURNER and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, LLC, Waste Connections Management Services, Inc. and Waste Connections US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America et al v. Roth et al
as 1:2024cv03987
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Leopoldo Garden
Defendant:
Alan R Roth, Nellie Perez Roth, Kew Gardens Family Physicians, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-3464
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, KEN BROOMFIELD, AREOLA, Sergeant and others
Perez-Chuello, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3454
Petitioner:
MARLUBYS YOHANNA PEREZ-CHUELLO and FABIANA VARGAS-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Silvas v. Ltx. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas
Defendant:
Ltx. Brown, Sgt. Perez, Corporal Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Ovidio Perez Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3437
Petitioner:
IVONNE GONZALEZ PEREZ, JEFFREY SERRANO GONZALEZ, JOSEF SERRANO GONZALEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
BOON v. WELLS et al
as 2:2024cv06628
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOON
Defendant:
RONALD WELLS, V.A. HOSPITAL, PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Perez
as 24-1484
Defendant:
JEREMIAH PEREZ and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
