Cases 31 - 40 of 2,972
Shawn Duncan v. Joshua Tessier, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
Joshua Tessier, Head Practitioner, Naphcare, Polk County Jail and others
Cardwell v. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
as 24-606
Plaintiff:
KALOMA CARDWELL
Defendant:
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP, THOMAS REID, JOHN BICK and others
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Polk
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terri Polk
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Polk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Sherrif Polk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, City Of Chicago Department Of Police, John Korolis, Star No. 21339 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Monica Perkins v. City of Des Moines, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
Monica Perkins
Defendant:
City of Des Moines, Dana Wingert, Individually and in his capacity as Chief of the Des Moines Police Department, Rodell Nydam, Individually and in his capacity as Police Officer of the Des Moines Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
In re: Russell Sanford, Jr. v. Polk County Sheriff
as 24-10513
Petitioner:
In re: RUSSELL L. SANFORD, JR.
Respondent:
POLK COUNTY SHERIFF
Polk v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Renard Truman Polk
Respondent:
Steven B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
