Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Muhammad v. Marsico et al
as 1:2018cv00419
Plaintiff:
Aiyda Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Edward M. Marsico, Jr., John C. O'Conner and David H. Judy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Hain et al
as 1:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
Aiyda Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
T. Hain, S. Haggart and Lawrence F. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Tully et al
as 1:2018cv00332
Plaintiff:
Aiyda Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
William T. Tully, Amy Schwarzel, Courtney Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05166
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Matthew Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Dorning et al
as 5:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Blake Dorning and Tommy Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
Christopher McCray , Osbert Campbell , Darryl Abrams and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdullah et al v. Weigant et al
as 3:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Muhammad Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Von Weigant, Monte D. Watkins and Beth Halstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Askari Muhammad v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 14-10024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASKARI ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FLORIDA SP WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Askari Muhammad v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 13-15963
Petitioner - Appellant:
ASKARI ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD, f.k.a. Thomas Knight
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
