Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Stay the Course West Virginia, et al v. Tennant, et al
as 1:2012cv01658
Plaintiff:
Stay the Course West Virginia , David Bailey , Pineville Lumber, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Natalie E. Tennant and Scott Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kanode v. Swope et al
as 1:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Derek C. Swope, Scott Ash, Anthony Bisaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munsey v. Sadler et al
as 1:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Munsey
Defendant:
William Sadler and Scott Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. Northern District Of West Virginia
as 1:2011cv00029
Petitioner:
Robert T. Ash, Sr.
Respondent:
Northern District Of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kanode v. Boggess et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Timothy D. Boggess, Southern Regional Drug and Violent Crime Task Force, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 5:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
Mark Ash
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, Larry D. Poynter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kanode v. Swope, et al
as 1:2009cv01530
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Derek C. Swope, Scott Ash, Mike L. Gills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. Walls et al
as 2:2009cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Brandon Arthur
Defendant:
Gerald Walls, Ashe and John McKay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson et al v. Harco National Insurance Company et al
as 6:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
John Dale Jacobson and Martha Jacobson
Defendant:
Harco National Insurance Company and Linda Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
