Cases 31 - 40 of 1,589
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner:
Adam Dahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Washington v. Adams
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Terron Darnell Washington
Defendant:
Candice Faith Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
Tom Dart, C.O. Guzman and Sgt. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02621
Plaintiff:
Justin Ben Zvi, Alina Lukashevsky and Adam Merriam
Defendant:
Delta Dental of New York Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant:
Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Lujano v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Adam Anthony Lujano
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Edward Villazobos, Dominique Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scheurich v. Ford County et al
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
David E Scheurich
Defendant:
Ford County, Ford County Sheriff's Office, Mark Doran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell et al v. City Of Newton et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Frances Powell and Dakota Boyd
Defendant:
City Of Newton, Adam Deckard, Trevor Honomichl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Doe, Director to get names of Doctor's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
