Cases 31 - 40 of 784
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd., Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd., Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Erez Vigodman and others
Richard White v. Jamie Tiernan, et al
as 23-12932
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ALTMAN WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE TIERNAN, WARREN RHEA and GAS SOUTH
Richard White v. Aaron Abromovitz, et al
as 23-12973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ALTMAN WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON ABROMOVITZ and GEORGIA POWER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
COX et al v. LANCASTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. COX, II, HEATHER K. COX and COXS AG SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
LANCASTER TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL CORNELL, CHRISTOPHER ALTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12546
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
White v. Abromovitz et al
as 1:2023cv02961
Plaintiff:
Richard Altman White
Defendant:
Aaron Abromovitz and Georgia Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
White v. Tiernan et al
as 1:2023cv02960
Plaintiff:
Richard Altman White
Defendant:
Jamie Tiernan, Warren Rhea and Gas South
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
