Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Copper et al v. Harris et al
as 4:2012cv00987
Plaintiff:
Dean Copper , Brenda Copper , Traci Gehm and others
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris , Benjamin Diehl and James M. Toma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copper et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2012cv00987
Plaintiff:
Dean Copper , Brenda Copper , Traci Gehm and others
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris, Benjamin Diehl and James M. Toma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allana Boroni et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv07303
Plaintiff:
Allana Boroni, Dean Cooper, Brenda Cooper and others
Defendant:
State of California, County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pryor v. State Farm Insurance Company et al
as 5:2011cv00964
Plaintiff:
Michael Pryor
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company, Sears Holdings Corporation, Electrolux International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amana Society, Inc, et al v. GHD, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00168
Defendant:
GHD, Inc and Excel Engineering, Inc
Plaintiff:
Amana Farms, Inc and Amana Society, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unique Product Solutions, Limited v Amana Imports, Inc.
as 5:2010cv01956
Plaintiff:
Unique Product Solutions, Limited
Defendant:
Amana Imports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Lorillard Tobacco Company v Amana Oil, Inc
as 2:2010cv13296
Plaintiff:
Lorillard Tobacco Company
Defendant:
Amana Oil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Byun v. Amuro et al
as 1:2010cv05417
Plaintiff:
David Byun
Defendant:
Namie Amuro, Avex Group Holdings, Inc., Avex Trax and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
