Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Securities And Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al
as 3:2011mc80214
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
CMKM Diamonds, Inc., Urban Casavant, John Edwards and others
Miscellaneou:
Harold P. Gewerter
SANTO v. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2011cv63902
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SANTO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTO v. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2011cv30007
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SANTO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Santo v. City of Norwalk et al
as 3:2010cv01347
Plaintiff:
Anthony Santo
Defendant:
City of Norwalk, Harry W. Rilling and Ronald M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Foster v. Anthony Santo
as 10-35270
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER ROCELLA FOSTER
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY SANTOS
Phat Chau v. Anthony Santo
as 10-35011
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHAT T. CHAU
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY SANTOS, Superintendent Oregon State Correctional Institution
Chau v. Santos
as 3:2008cv06202
Petitioner:
Phat T. Chau
Respondent:
Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00437
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
CMKM Diamonds, Inc., 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC, NevWest Securities Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Foster v. Santos
as 3:2007cv01224
Petitioner:
Walter Rocella Foster
Respondent:
Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Santos
as 3:2007cv01231
Petitioner:
Walter Rocella Foster
Respondent:
Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
