Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Ralph Taylor v. Daryl Lewi
as 13-17468
Petitioner - Appellant:
RALPH ANTONIO TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
DARYL G. LEWIS, Warden
Taylor v. Harris et al
as 5:2013cv04831
Plaintiff:
Ralph Antonio Taylor
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris, Daryl G. Lewis and Phil Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Lewis
as 3:2013cv04118
Petitioner:
Ralph Antonio Taylor
Respondent:
Daryl G. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ralph Taylor v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 13-16569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH ANTONIO TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, DARYL G. LEWIS, Warden and PHIL DALEY, Deputy District Attorney
Taylor v. Harris et al
as 1:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
Ralph Antonio Taylor
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris, Daryl G. Lewis and Phil Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BROWN
as 1:2012cv00173
Petitioner:
LAZARUS ANTONIO TAYLOR
Respondent:
BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarence Ganaway v. Timothy Garther, et al
as 12-3964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE GANAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY GARTHER, Police Officer #9837, City of Cleveland, Ohio, ANTONIO TAYLOR, Police Officer #1859, City of Cleveland, Ohio, ANTONIO HARPER, Police Officer #1515, City of Cleveland, Ohio and others
Taylor v. USA
as 3:2012cv00450
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Antonio Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taylor v. Hinds County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Antonio Taylor
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff's Department and John Doe Deputies/Guards 1-20 of the Hinds County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv00460
Petitioner:
Antuan Antonio Taylor
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
