Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 2:2019cv00100
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, Stephanie Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Southbound Smokehouse, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00087
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Velvet Apple Music, Post Oak Publishing and others
Defendant:
Southbound Smokehouse, LLC and Brian Brittingham
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 5:2019cv00209
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, LEAD NURSE STEPHANIE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayner v. Appling County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2019cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dinetha L. Rayner
Defendant:
Wilton Edwards, Kacey Newberry, Jeffery Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APPLING v. COX
as 5:2018cv00444
Plaintiff:
SHA'RODNEY APPLING
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSEBERRY v. APPLE INC et al
as 7:2018cv00189
Defendant:
APPLE INC, VERIZON and BEST BUY
Plaintiff:
HELEN ROSEBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hospital Authority of Baxley et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00115
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Appling County and Hospital Authority of Baxley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In the Matter of the Search of Black Apple iPhone, Model A1661 with UDID: la2ddd4800318al696f3808f48f0771dl2c9b3eb
as 4:2018mc00035
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Black Apple iPhone
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
