Cases 31 - 40 of 713
Armenta v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01996
Plaintiff:
Santos Armenta
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silva Armenta v. Garland
as 23-187
Petitioner:
TADEO ENRIQUE SILVA ARMENTA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Armenta
as 23-7035
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JUAN ARMENTA
(PC) Armenta v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
R. St. Andre, Shalom Orenstein, Brian Kiebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John McClintock, et al v. T. Cooper, et al
as 23-15513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT MCCLINTOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
T. COOPER, Sgt., M. ARMENTA, Guard, WINKLER, Guard and others
Defendant:
B. MCCLOUGHAN, JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, M. VOONG and others
(PC) Armenta v. Miranda et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Rafael Miranda, K. Reuter, B. Kiebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jessica Armenta v. Fave Me, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jessica Armenta
Defendant:
Fave Me, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Amin et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
Susan A Sangiorgio, Ephraim Vashovsky, Learan Kahanov and others
Defendant:
Republic of Iran Islamic and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Armenta #347230 v. Weigel
as 2:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Joseph T Armenta
Defendant:
N Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
