Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Barber v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Simon, Attorney General of North Carolina, Attorney General of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2019cv01833
Defendant:
Governor Of The State Of Oregon, Employment Department and Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. U.S. Attorney General
as 3:2019cv01642
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demos v. Attorney General of the State of Washington et al
as 3:2019cv01529
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Washington, Governor Of The State Of Oregon and Governor of the State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. U.S. Attorney General
as 3:2019cv01227
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01033
Plaintiff:
Menphrey Douglas McGee
Defendant:
Governors Office, State of Oregon, Attorney General State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swanson v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv02148
Defendant:
ATSDR, United States, VA Oregon Regional Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Singh et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2018cv01912
Defendant:
Field Office Dir. Richard L Miller, Richard Ives, Ronald D Vitiello and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh and Pachattar Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
