Cases 31 - 40 of 90
City of Los Angeles AIHM Hotel Motel Association et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv01295
Plaintiff:
HSI Hospitality Group, Ekdant Associates Inc., Vijendra Patel and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Barry V. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017at00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bhagat v. Nielsen et al
as 5:2017cv00166
Petitioner:
Shilchandra U. Bhagat
Respondent:
Kirstjen Nielsen, Thomas D. Homan, Sean W. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bhagat v. USA
as 2:2017cv13169
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Hemal Bhagat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv21333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08149
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bhagat et al v. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01465
Plaintiff:
Arjun Bhagat , Anita Manwani , Jay A. Morgeson and others
Defendant:
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
