Cases 31 - 40 of 169
RICHARDSON v. MACON BIBB COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv00322
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, MACON BIBB COUNTY, MACON BIBB SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Richardson and CHRISTOPHER RAYSHAWN RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2020cv00320
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, Deputy Lawrence Prichard, Deputy Devin Keith and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Richardson, ATTORNEY DEBRA G GOMEZ and CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOND v. BIBB COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 5:2020cv00276
Defendant:
MACON HOSPITAL, BIBB COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA-LEE HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEPHENS v. MACON BIBB COUNTY LEC
as 5:2020cv00224
Defendant:
MACON BIBB COUNTY LEC
Plaintiff:
TYERONE DAVON STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIPP v. LOFTON et al
as 5:2020cv00133
Defendant:
DEPUTY DERRICK LOFTON, DEPUTY TOMMY HARRIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND NATHANIEL HIPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDWICK et al v. CORRECTHEALTH BIBB LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00127
Defendant:
SCOTT CHAPMAN, DANIEL MATTOX, Michael Parrott and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hardwick and Scott Hardwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODARD v. BIBB COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2020cv00108
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY JAIL and SERGEANT WILKERSON
Plaintiff:
LARON WOODARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. BIBB COUNTY LEC JAIL et al
as 5:2020cv00096
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE ONEAL GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BIBB COUNTY JAIL
as 5:2020cv00026
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DOE et al
as 5:2019cv00512
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Bibb County Jail and DOE
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DAUNE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
