Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 410
Alicea v. Cage et al
as 3:2023cv00947
Plaintiff: Samuel Alicea
Defendant: Cage, Parsns, Sandone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. Beard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv11575
Defendant: Jerome Waefield, Curtis Beard, Jill Kline and others
Plaintiff: Landis Cage
CAGE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00613
Petitioner: SHARDAE CAGE
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Sanchez v. Eddy County Board of Commissioners et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff: Jason Sanchez
Defendant: Eddy County Board of Commissioners, Jared Rostro, Eric Threlkeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Medel v. Joy et al
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff: Xavier Medel
Defendant: Joy, Tawanna Furtick, Eva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker-Nevels, on behalf of the Estate of Kenneth Cage, deceased v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20478
Plaintiff: Eva Tucker-Nevels, on behalf of the Estate of Kenneth Cage, deceased
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quinton CageIn re: Quinton Cage
as 23-5201
Petitioner: In re: QUINTON A. CAGE
Cage v. DeJoy
as 7:2023cv00066
Plaintiff: Dineka Cage
Defendant: US Postmaster Louis DeJoy and Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Marvin Cage v. Warren Montgomery
as 23-55097
Petitioner / Appellant: MARVIN DESHAWN CAGE
Respondent / Appellee: WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Warden
Quinton CageIn re: Quinton Cage
as 23-5040
Petitioner: In re: QUINTON A. CAGE
Respondent: JAMES M. HOLLOWAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?