Cases 31 - 40 of 2,452
Warren v. Walker John & Debra Trust, et al.
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
WALKER JOHN & DEBRA TRUST, BERHAN AHMEN, PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 8 L L C and others
Toledo Canino et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Ruth Toledo Canino, Nelson De Leon Camacho, conjugal partnership between Mrs. Toledo and Mr. De Leon and others
Defendant:
United States of America, JOHN DOE, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Morgan v. Hopkinsville Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
DeWayne A. Morgan
Defendant:
Hopkinsville Police Department, Major Ceasar Sierra, Captain Todd DeArmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Warren v. Heartland Homeowners Association, et al.
as 24-1448
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
HEARTLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, TAYLOR ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES and others
Camacho v. CNMI Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections, LT. Benjamin Lizama and COIII Lianna Quitugua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Giovanni Camacho
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GIOVANNI JAVIER CAMACHO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tellez Camacho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-705
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO TELLEZ CAMACHO, THALIA TELLEZ CONTRERAS, OCTAVIO TELLEZ CONTRERAS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Camacho v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv20502
Plaintiff:
Selsa Camacho
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
