Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Gonzalez-Jimenez v. USA
as 8:2016cv01874
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Jimenez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Julio Gonzalez-Jimenez
as 16-12809
Petitioner:
In re: JULIO CESAR GONZALEZ-JIMENEZ
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gonzalez et al v. Wilmington Trust, NA et al
as 3:2015cv01565
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gonzalez and Anel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Wilmington Trust, NA , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
IN RE THE APPLICATION OF Rosa Elena CISNEROS DE REAL v. Gonzalez Pineda
as 1:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
IN RE THE APPLICATION OF Rosa Elena CISNEROS DE REAL
Defendant:
Julio Cesar Gonzalez Pineda
Ocasio, et al v. Soto
as 14-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE OCASIO, GIL AGOSTO-SANTIAGO, LUIS ALDIVA-LOPEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NEFTALI SOTO
Gonzalez-Mendoza v. Varwey et al
as 3:2014cv00450
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Mendoza
Defendant:
John Varwey, J. F. Byrne and Juan Luyando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cesar Gonzalez-Villa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71101
Petitioner:
CESAR GONZALEZ-VILLA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Julio Gonzalez-Mendoza
as 14-10401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR GONZALEZ-MENDOZA, a.k.a. Marvin Alonzo Osorto-Hernandez
Ocasio v. Soto et al
as 3:2013cv01699
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ocasio , Gil Agosto-Santiago , Luis R. Aldiva-Lopez and others
Defendant:
Neftali Soto , Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Soto-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Leveratto et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01564
Plaintiff:
Atilio I Leveratto and Cesar Gonzalez
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Washington Hospital Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
