Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Walker v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00731
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Earl Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Charles Thoma
as 16-50716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES EARL THOMAS
Baker v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Baker
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Central Arizona Detention Center, Central Arizona Detention Center Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Union County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Robbins
Defendant:
Union County Sheriff Dept., Baron Baker, Brian Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Sampson v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20200
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES EARL SAMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sampson v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv03381
Petitioner:
Charles Earl Sampson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughn et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated et al
as 1:2012cv06299
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn , Charles Earl Vaughn , Anna Marie Vaughn and others
Defendant:
Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated , Watson Laboratories Incorporated , Watson Pharma Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Metcalf et al v. Bullock et al
as 5:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Metcalf , Winifred Laverne Metcalf and Winifred Lagreta Gaisford
Defendant:
James Donald Bullock and Ean Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meadows v. USA
as 0:2011cv07192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Earl Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Charles Watson
as 11-2338
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES EARL WATSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
