Cases 31 - 40 of 209
USA v. Charles Scott
as 20-3535
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SCOTT, also known as MC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Scott et al v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11033
Plaintiff:
Brenda McCoy, Dominique Ferdinand and Charles Scott
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Gate Gourmet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Charles Scott v. Warden James T Vaughn Corr, et al
as 20-3157
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SCOTT
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64386
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCOTT
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IOV 1341 Jarvis Saginaw, LLC v. Seymour
as 1:2020cv03881
Plaintiff:
IOV 1341 Jarvis Saginaw, LLC
Defendant:
Charles Scott Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. LaPorte County Community Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00476
Defendant:
Brown, Atwater and LaPorte County Community Corrections
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEFEBRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11315
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCOTT LEFEBRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cline et al v. LaPorte County Community Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas D Galloway, II, Charles Scott, Mario Hanserd and others
Defendant:
Atwater, LaPorte County Community Corrections and Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensley v. Einalem LLC (PLR1)
as 3:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Einalem, LLC, d/b/a VapeDaugz, LLC, d/b/a Vape Daugz Premium E-Liquid, Charles Scott and Melanie Scott
Plaintiff:
Hannah E. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
