Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Chijioke Ben-Yisrayl v. Ron Neal
as 16-1013
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHIJIOKE B. BEN-YISRAYL
Respondent - Appellee:
RON NEAL
SMG et al v. SCO Family of Services et al
as 1:2014cv00815
Plaintiff:
SMG and Atavia Moorer
Defendant:
SCO Family of Services , Darlene Ellison , Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick Cooper v. Cynthia Tampkins, et al
as 14-55046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDRICK A. COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA Y. TAMPKINS, R. BREWER, Correctional Sergeant, P. CARDOZA, Correctional Peace Officer and others
Portis et al v. National Football League et al
as FLS/1:13-cv-22884
Plaintiff:
Clinton Portis , Chris Akins , David Ball and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties LLC
Portis et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2013cv22884
Plaintiff:
Clinton Portis , Chris Akins , David Ball and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fredrick A Cooper v. Cynthia Y Tampkins et al
as 5:2013cv01029
Defendant:
R Brewer, J. Butler, P. Cardoza and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick A Cooper
Cooper v. Tampkins et al
as 3:2013cv01268
Plaintiff:
Fredrick A. Cooper
Defendant:
Cynthia Y. Tampkins, R. Brewer, P. Cardoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEN-YISRAYL v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00661
Petitioner:
CHIJIOKE BOMANI BEN-YISRAYL
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Osuji v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 10-2259
Petitioner:
Michael Chijioke Osuji
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Okoro
as 08-20391
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIJIOKE VICTOR OKORO, also known as Victor Okoro, also known as Chiji V Okoro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
