Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Ryan v. City Of Roseville, et al
as 2:2017cv01453
Defendant:
City Of Roseville, Roseville Community Development Corporation, University Development Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard J Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Roseville et al
as 2:2017at00705
Defendant:
City Of Roseville, roseville community development corporation, university development foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard J Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birkeland v. Jorgenson et al
as 0:2017cv01149
Plaintiff:
Dean Birkeland
Defendant:
John Edward Jorgenson , Kyle Eckert , Joseph Robert Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party:
East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner:
Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor:
United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Waterford Township Police & Fi v. Regional Management Corp.
as 17-598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Defendant - Appellee:
Regional Management Corp., Palladium Equity Partners III, L.P., Palladium Equity Partners III, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon et al v. Kurta et al
as 2:2017cv10195
Plaintiff:
Ervin Dixon and Elsa Dixon
Defendant:
Judith Kurta, Dennis Kurta, City of Roseville, MI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015at01137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAMOTTE v. HOUSTOULAKIS et al
as 2:2015cv12218
Plaintiff:
KURTIS JAMES LAMOTTE
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER HOUSTOULAKIS, SERGEANT DICKEY, DETECTIVE SGT. SHOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
