Cases 31 - 40 of 34,610
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, L. Lucas, W. Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cooke et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Terrance Davis
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke and Andrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Cooke et al
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, Drummond, Ruebart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love #831271 v. Rydahal et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Mendo Love #831271
Defendant:
Unknown Rydahal, Unknown Cook, Unknown Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vitellaro v. City of Park Ridge et al
as 1:2024cv04797
Plaintiff:
Michael Vitellaro
Defendant:
City of Park Ridge, Frank Kaminski, Lynn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLeon (PS) v. County of Adams, The et al
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joseph DeLeon, Sr.
Defendant:
County of Adams, The, Holguin and J. M. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv22207
Plaintiff:
Bianca Cook
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
EGGERT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
JAMES EGGERT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VELICKA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
LINDA VELICKA
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
