Cases 31 - 40 of 171
MAY-BENJAMIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv12342
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRINE D MAY-BENJAMIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Patrice Harold, et al
as 19-2458
Defendant / Appellant:
SWEWAT, LLC
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, PATRICE L. HAROLD, WAYNE COUNTY, MI TREASURER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Patrice Harold, et al
as 19-2459
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICE L. HAROLD
Defendant:
SWEWAT, LLC, STATE OF MICHIGAN, WAYNE COUNTY, MI TREASURER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mays v. Parris et al
as 3:2019cv01082
Plaintiff:
David D. Mays
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays #218101 v. Skytta et al
as 2:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Unknown Skytta, Nicole Sunberg, Shannon Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Mays #218101
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffines Retail Partners LP et al v. Atlas Apartments Acquisition LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02425
Plaintiff:
Benbrook Winchester, LP, The Russell 1996 Investment Trust U/A/D May 10, 1996, Huffines Plano Properties, LP and others
Defendant:
Atlas Apartments Acquisition, LLC, Steven Ivankovich and Atlas Apartments Acquisition LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
May v. Heimgartner
as 19-3206
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM D. MAY
USA v. Patrice Harold, et al
as 19-1947
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICE L. HAROLD
Defendant:
SWEWAT, LLC, STATE OF MICHIGAN, WAYNE COUNTY, MI TREASURER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CURRO et al v. MARLEY & ME PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv13250
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS CURRO CURRO and JOSEPH CURRO
Defendant:
JOSEPH MARLEY, VISIONARY DEVELOPERS, LLC, SHAWN D. MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
