Cases 31 - 40 of 102
KROZ, LLC et al v. Avery et al
as 6:2020cv00426
Defendant:
Frederick Avery, Mark Richard, Daniel Richard and others
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Smith, Keith Taylor, KROZ, LLC d/b/a Superior Cruise and Travel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENTLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03712
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RICHARD BENTLEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles v. Peterson et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Danielle Richard, M. Sullivan, D. Richard and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Wilford Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Daniel Mincey
as 20-40094
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL RICHARD MINCEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Melvin Tyler v. Robert Schollmeyer, et al
as 20-1028
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Joseph Spillane, Robert Schollmeyer, Mary R. Russell and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melvin Leroy Tyler, State of Missouri, by Melvin Leroy Tyler
Mythen v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv06402
Plaintiff:
Daniel Richard Mythen
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04236
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mythen v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv01372
Plaintiff:
Daniel Richard Mythen
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATES et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03217
Plaintiff:
CARL BOURGEOIS, MAURICE BOVEAR, KENNETH BOROM and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caplan v. Albers Appliance Sales & Service Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv62076
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
DAVID EUGENE ALBERS, ALBERS APPLIANCE SALES & SERVICE INC. and DANIEL RICHARD ALBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
