Cases 31 - 40 of 5,862
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Yarnell Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and CCDOC Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dear v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03712
Plaintiff:
Cassius Dear
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03674
Plaintiff:
Dmitri D. Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, D. Griffin and G. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Acey et al
as 1:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
K. Acey, Officer Tisza, T. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Creuzot
as 24-10395
Plaintiff:
Deuntae Thomas, Estate/Cestui Qui Trust
Defendant:
John Coleman Creuzot, #05069200 14th Amendment US Corporate Citizen Acting as District Attorney, Dallas County, City of Dallas, Texas and others
Bennett v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Bennett
Defendant:
Jerri Cooper, Marin Share, Dawn R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter v. Magic Darts, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Laura Baxter
Defendant:
Magic Darts, Inc., John A. Baxter, Jr. and Kelly Baxter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Ostrow et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Ethan Ostrow and Nora Pomper
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Doe and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Jamayle Howard
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart and Concepcion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
