Cases 31 - 40 of 469
Stanley v. Morgan et al
as 6:2022cv01655
Plaintiff:
David Earl Stanley and David Stanley
Defendant:
City of Lafayette, Thomas Glover, Scott Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WATTLETON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Sutherland v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
as 22-1173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EARL SUTHERLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY and others
WATTLETON v. U.S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
U.S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Kates v. USA
as 2:2022cv00008
Petitioner:
David Earl Kates
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Poole et al
as 8:2021cv02996
Petitioner:
David Earl Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
John Poole and John Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenner et al. v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 4:2021cv03854
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC d/b/a MR. COOPER, DAVID EARL FENNER, KIMBERLY ANNE FENNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guillory v. Tucker et al
as 3:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
Michael Damien Guillory
Defendant:
David Earl Tucker and Bryan Tucker Hauling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROOM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02344
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL CROOM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATTLETON v. CARVAJAL
as 1:2021cv02899
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
