Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Carolina v. Berube et al
as 3:2017cv01787
Plaintiff:
Carolina
Defendant:
Berube, Gillette, Faucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carolina v. Roy et al
as 3:2017cv01788
Plaintiff:
Carolina
Defendant:
Paul Roy, Gaudet, Dousis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Bile v. Attorney General United State
as 16-4177
Petitioner:
EUGENE EBENE BILE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bumble and Bumble LLC v. Pros Choice Beauty Care Inc et al
as 2:2016mc00089
Defendant:
Active Beauty Inc, Doris Arash-Eben, CVS Pharmacy Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bumble and Bumble LLC
Bumble And Bumble, LLC v. Pro s Choice Beauty Care, Inc., et al
as 2:2016mc00078
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Active Beauty, Inc. and Pro s Choice Beauty Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Active Beauty, Inc., Doris Arash-Eben, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bumble And Bumble, LLC
ThirdParty Defendant:
E and M ESR, Inc., Jomax International Corp. and Primary One, LLC
RODRIGUEZ et al v. FIRST GROUP AMERICA INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01638
Plaintiff:
TRINIDAD MENDEZ RODRIGUEZ , MAYRA MORALES , MANUEL JIMENEZ DE LA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
FIRST GROUP AMERICA INC. and FIRST STUDENT MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 2:2016cv00007
Defendant:
ATEBERRY, J BAKER, MAYOR BALLARD and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2015cv02143
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
