Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Taub v. Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv07491
Plaintiff:
Ross Taub
Defendant:
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation and Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv13843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Antwi v. Stern et al
as 1:2017cv07888
Plaintiff:
Beverly D. Antwi
Defendant:
Douglas K. Stern, Esq., Abrams, Fensternman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf LLP, Andrew Racine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomason v. Moeller et al
as 4:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Marilynn Thomason
Defendant:
Gregory W Moeller, Darren B Simpson, Jim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Eisman et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2014cv04556
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Eisman and Michael Eisman
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eisman et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 1:2014cv00520
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Eisman and Michael Eisman
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eisman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13631
Plaintiff:
Mary Eisman and John Allen Eisman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
