Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Coulter v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv04514
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harry Coulter, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulter #285754 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv03435
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harry Coulter, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Corizon and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv02168
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harris, III and Connie L. Harris
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National Default Servicing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Taylor v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2017cv00633
Petitioner:
Eugene Harris Taylor
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2017cv00494
Petitioner:
Scott Eugene Harris
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Hall
as 1:2017cv02024
Petitioner:
Johnny Eugene Harris
Respondent:
Hilton Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02061
Plaintiff:
TARRON EUGENE HARRIS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and MONTEREY FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Darrell Harris v. S. Escamilla
as 17-15230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL EUGENE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ESCAMILLA
FLETCHER et al v. HARRIS
as 1:2015cv05483
Plaintiff:
EVELYN FLETCHER and MALIKAH FLETCHER
Defendant:
JASON EUGENE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Fletcher et al v. Harris
as 1:2015cv05487
Counter Defendant:
Evelyn Fletcher
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Fletcher and Malikah Fletcher
Counter Claimant:
Jason Eugene Harris
Defendant:
Jason Eugene Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
