Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Goodvine, Christopher v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Michael Dittman , Sandra Hautamaki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green, Damien v. Laurent, Dawn et al
as 3:2014cv00326
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Defendant:
Dawn M. Laurent , Karan Anderson, Myier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe, Michael v. Trish et al
as 3:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
Michael Cortez Rowe
Defendant:
Trish , Martin , Heinzyl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, Jeffrey v. Schneider et al
as 3:2013cv00842
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Schneider , Bartz, Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, Jeffrey v. Laurent, Dawn et al
as 3:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Dawn Laurent , Nicholas Buhr, Marcelo Trinidad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Accident Fund Insurance Company of America v. Garrison et al
as 4:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Accident Fund Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
George Garrison , Keith Van Pelt , Steve Burian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EXNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 5:2011cv02437
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. EXNER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Brown v. Graham
as 11-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Geneo Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
H.D. Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Dawson Brown, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Auburn Correctional Facility, Donald Sawyer, Executive Director, Central New York Psychiatric and others
Brown v. Graham et al
as 9:2007cv01353
Plaintiff:
Geneo Brown
Defendant:
H.D. Graham, Dawson Brown, Donald Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EXNER V DVA
as 08-7002
Claimant-Appellant:
Frank H. Exner
Respondent-Appellee:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
